I'll
Have Some Watchmen - But Hold the Squid
Posted
09:12 (GMT) 24th May 2011 by David J. Bishop
Let’s
talk about Watchmen. Chances are you’ve seen the
film or read the book or both. I’m probably not spoiling anything.
If for whatever reason you’re unfamiliar with the story, please
experience it in some form or anther before reading what I have
to say about it. The film alone was three Goddamn years ago. I’m
trading up-to-the-minute relevance here with the ability to discuss
all aspects of the plot and the ending of this wonderful work of
art. You have been warned.
As
with V for Vendetta, I prefer the film adaptation to the
graphic novel, although I get the impression that I’m not
supposed to. My high-brow graphic-novel-reading friends are horrified
when I tell them this. Then again, people are often horrified when
I tell them things.
Alan
Moore, the writer of both graphic novels, has been very vocal in
condemning the mistreatment of his life’s work at the hands
of Hollywood film-makers. And, let’s be fair, it has been
rough. As in ‘prison shower room’ rough. The
League of Extraordinary Gentlemen springs to mind as a
particularly hateful example. If I was Alan Moore and someone’s
first move when adapting a book I’d written for the screen
was to retitle it LXG I would start to get the feeling
impression that the nuances of my opus would not remain intact.
But
V for Vendetta and Watchmen are different animals
altogether. I’m the proud owner of both graphic novels and
in both cases I saw the film counterparts first. I immediately decided
that they were both great stories without realising I was picking
a side. When
I picked up the V for Vendetta book I was bitterly disappointed
to find all my favourites lines of dialogue and scenes were missing
from the book, with few exceptions. Imagine my embarrassment! I
bought a book so I could club people over the head with how obviously
superior the novel is, don'tcherknow only
to discover that the V for Vendetta I fell in love with
was the one written and produced by the men responsible for the
loathsome Matrix sequels. On
the other hand, when I picked up the Watchmen book I was
delighted to find all my favourite lines of dialogue and scenes
were present and completely unchanged, to the point where the book
can serve in large part as an extended version of the film.
Finally,
then, an adaptation of an Alan Moore book that he can be proud of!
Is he? I haven’t really been paying attention. Please tell
me, someone, if Alan Moore is happy with the film version of Watchmen.
Now
I’m in a difficult position. I generally resent film adaptations
that just take the source material as a jumping off point and create
their own work of art that ends up only sharing character names
and a title with the original, but in the case of V for Vendetta
I believe the result was a superior work of art. Then Wathmen
comes along with the opposite approach, the most slavishly faithful
adaptation of a film I have ever seen, and yet I still prefer the
adaptation for all the little changes it makes. And wasn’t
I complaining
just a few weeks ago about the horrible abuse of Norse Mythology
by Marvel comics?
What’s
the lesson here? Should adaptations be faithful to the original?
Yes, but only if I like the original. And even then, only to the
parts I like. There!
Anyway,
I assumed that the Watchmen film would be welcomed by fans of the
book in the same way that I would welcome a wholly accurate Þrymskviða
movie. But
all I hear is “Where’s the giant squid?” “I
want a giant squid.” “I can’t believe they blah
blah blah.” Enough!
We get it – a Watchmen sans squid is a wholly different
Watchmen to one that keeps its squid in tact. Did you ever stop
to think that might be a good
thing?
I can
explain exactly why Watchmen is better without its squid.
My argument is fourfold!
I
Understand the Principle of 'Chekhov's Gun' and I Don't Remember
Anyone Placing a Squid Over the Mantelpiece
It’s just rushed in there at the end – look, I know
that isn’t the fault of the comic because it wasn’t
allowed to extend its print run but if the climax of your story
focuses on an enormous mollusc with mind powers you need to set
up the ingredients for that shit in act one. You can’t just
slip in at the last minute that all this was possible because psychics
exist. Because people are going to, quite rightly, think “They
do? Since when?”
If
this is a world with psychics and they will be important to the
story at any point you really need to mention them before the half-way
mark. Considering the world-building of Watchmen so thoroughly
explores the game-changing consequences of all of its supernatural
aspects, why does it so completely ignore the ramifications of there
being psychics?
Huge
chunks of exposition need to be just dropped into the reader’s
lap to justify the squid, leading to many lots scenes of superheroes
standing around talking and not punching each other. The film has
an exposition-heavy climax too, of course, but at least it mixes
things up with some dramatic fighting to give you a sense that characters
are doing all in their power to stop shit from going down. Especially
Night Owl, who actually gets upset and chastises the villain instead
of his response in the book which is to shrug, have sex with his
girlfriend and fall asleep. Yeah, it’s not exactly the Battle
of Pelennor Fields.
I can't
say how much of this is the fault of the space restraints and the
deadlines etc. but they must have had some idea how they were going
to end the book - the result was a load of clunky dialogue that
only serves to explain a squid they don't even need.
Squid,
This is Not Your Time to Shine
A squid simply does not belong in this story. Is there a squid motif?
Is this actually a comic about a squid and I’m too stupid
to pick up on the nuances? In my ignorance and knuckle-dragging
thickness I was under the impression that Watchmen was
an uncompromising deconstruction of superhero tropes, exploring
what would motivate somebody to dress in a skin-tight costume and
hit people, considering the people who do so in real life are all
people with very specific sexual fetishes.
In
the same way the Shaun of the Dead asks of zombie films
“What if this really happened in England?” and is hilarious,
Watchmen asks the same of superheroes and is nightmarish,
except replace “England” with “alternate-history
Cold War Nixon presidency”. Doubly nightmarish.
I might
be getting side-tracked. I’ll start again. Watchmen
is really about how scary Superman is. Not just a superman,
but the Superman. By having so many powers – super-speed
that borders on omnipresence, super-hearing that borders on omniscience
and indestructibility that borders on the ridiculous (I mean, how
does he cut his hair?) – Superman has been elevated to godhood,
or something unsettlingly similar. Superman is God, basically, so
the fact that he’s such a swell guy rescuing people all the
time means that the writer of that issue believes in a loving God
who intervenes in people’s lives. You only need to call out
his name and you will be saved, my child.
Right,
so in a world where 90,000 people can be vaporised by one nuclear
bomb, Alan Moore proposes that we might need a new model of God
and therefore a new superman – Dr Manhattan is Superman for
a world threatened by nuclear holocaust: towering, aloof, calculating
and frighteningly detached from the human condition. Dr Manhattan
doesn’t really care about saving the world and therefore neither
does God. But
of course Dr Manhattan isn’t literally God, he’s just
a man who, through science, has been granted terrifying destructive
power and international respect – kind of like a country with
a massive arsenal of nuclear weapons. And, in fact, Dr Manhattan
is even used as a deterrent against Soviet aggression and he helps
America win a war.
So
Dr Manhattan is Superman, he’s God and he’s the atomic
bomb.
But
the bomb motif doesn't end there. The constant threat of nuclear
war hangs over all of Watchmen and, with the growing sense
that a nuclear war is inevitable, the already fucked-up characters
begin to feel increasingly powerless. The only people capable of
decisive action are the sociopaths like Rorschach and, yes, Richard
Nixon; everyone else remains helpless and inert, including (frighteningly)
Dr Manhattan.
At
its core, then, Watchmen is a story about people anticipating
a horrible disaster which they feel powerless to prevent, which
concludes with (spoilers) a horrible disaster nobody prevents. That
disaster needs to be a bomb. And it needs to be directly linked
to Dr Manhattan. Otherwise you’re left with a story about
everyone waiting for a bomb to drop in which no bomb drops.
It's as simple as that, if everyone is scared of nuclear war, just
have the character who represents nuclear weapons be the culprit
for the scary thing. No squid.
Isn’t
Ozymandias Supposed to be the Smartest Man in the World?
You’re Ozymandias. You’ve tricked Dr Manhattan into
helping you replicate his power in the name of scientific advancement.
You can teleport anything you like. Why is the first thing you went
to a big genetically modified squid?
Yes,
your fake alien is a delicious deception. He just teleported into
the middle of New York. But don’t you think someone is going
to even suspect that Dr Manhattan could have teleported it, given
that everyone knows he can do shit like that? And no-one will suspect
your creation is the product of genetic engineering; they’ll
all buy the ‘alien from another dimension’ angle? Dude,
you have a freaking purple tiger strolling around your bloody living
room. I think the purple cat is out of the bag. And nobody will
suspect that these psychic visions of an alien world could come
from a human psychic when, ostensibly, people know about those guys
too? Sure, it’s never been mentioned before but nobody balked
either when you slipped it in there. I mean, I can only assume the
existence of psychics is common knowledge. Is the secret to your
genius, Ozymandias, your ability to bring together three elements
into one thing and thus render them untraceable?
And
I’ve heard it argued by staunch opponents of the film that
the threat of Dr Manhattan’s god-like wrath falls apart at
the end because he leaves Earth, so it’s only a matter of
time before people realise the hammer will never fall. Oh, and when
no alien invasion materialises things will be any different? Couple
of things, okay? Firstly, in our world the last time God destroyed
the world was, if you believe such things, when Noah built his ark
and yet as recently as last Saturday people were pissing
their pants over the end of the world at his hand, even after he
promised he would never do it again and invented rainbows
as a visual reminder. Secondly, Dr Manhattan can duplicate himself.
Motherfucker is to all intents ubiquitous and he can remember the
future. You can’t sneak shit past this guy without giving
at least two people cancer and creating a shit-tonne of tachyons.
And everyone knows Nixon is really bad at making tachyons. If he
can simultaneously gang-bang Silk Spectre and do his physics
homework I think he can explore space whilst keeping an eye on international
politics. Hell, we already saw him visit Earth whilst remaining
on Mars. This is not a big stretch.
Smartest
man in the world my pasty white ass.
You’re
Forgetting About 9-11
I don't want to be crass about this but it needs to be said. The
whole point of the squid is that it gives the nations of the world
a common enemy. Superficial tentically details aside, it’s
a horrifying attack on New York by a threatening force with a clear
message of hate. This is what provokes America and its enemies to
set their differences aside.
We’ve
already seen how that pans out in real life. The
first thing America did was invade Afghanistan on the basis that
this would lead to captured Osama Bin Laden. A short while later
they went after Iraq, even though everyone knew at the time they
didn’t have shit to do with any of this. Maybe Iran would
have been next if McCain had been elected. Cut
to ten years after original attack. Obama kills Bin Laden with a
small strike force 160 miles away from Afghanistan and 1600 miles
away from Iraq.
What
I’m saying is, all it takes is for Nixon to make up some nonsense
about how Russia is hiding aliens and it’s nighty-night to
world peace. It doesn’t matter if it’s a lie, we’ve
already seen that people will go along with it anyway. There’s
no way they could have gone with the original ending to Watchmen,
it’s far too optimistic.
Wow,
that is saddening. Quick, need to end on a happy note. Kittens!
|